Feature Reality Check
We compare what the product appears to do with what is actually implemented, connected, persisted, and reliable.
AI-Built App Review & Rescue
If your app was built with AI and is becoming a real product, we review what actually works, what is fragile, what needs fixing, and the clearest path to production without rebuilding more than necessary.
Built with one of these, or something similar?
The Handoff Point
AI coding tools can get a product surprisingly far. The difficult part starts when the app needs real users, payments, private data, integrations, reliability, or a second engineer who has to understand the code.
Our job is to tell you what you have now, what can safely stay, and what needs professional engineering before the product grows.
The first question we answer
Engineering Review
A clean-looking codebase can still have broken product flows, and a messy-looking generated codebase can still contain plenty worth keeping. We look at both.
We compare what the product appears to do with what is actually implemented, connected, persisted, and reliable.
We look at whether the current structure can support the next stage of the product without making every new feature harder.
We inspect the areas that become important when real users, private data, payments, and external services enter the product.
We identify launch blockers and operational gaps that may not show up while you are testing the happy path yourself.
The Decision Framework
We do not start from the assumption that AI-generated code should be thrown away. Each important part of the product gets a practical engineering decision.
Parts that are already sound, understandable, and good enough for the product's next stage.
Useful parts that should stay but need targeted engineering work before you rely on them.
Only the pieces where rebuilding is clearly safer or cheaper than continuing to patch the current implementation.
From Review to Rescue
Share the live app or preview, repository access, the AI tools you used, and the parts you are least confident about.
We inspect the product behavior and codebase, then trace the important flows instead of judging the project from code style alone.
You get a prioritized view of what works, what is incomplete, what is risky, and what should be kept, fixed, or replaced.
We turn the findings into a practical sequence of fixes, production-hardening work, and optional feature development.
If you want, XSOLAI can implement the fixes and continue as the engineering team behind the product.
Do not send passwords, private API keys, production secrets, or credentials by email or chat. We can arrange secure access when it is needed.
No. The goal is to preserve useful work. We recommend replacing a component only when there is a clear engineering reason to do so.
Yes. The review is based on the resulting application, architecture, codebase, data flows, and integrations rather than one specific builder.
That is a strong reason to review it carefully. We can focus the assessment on the highest-risk production flows first, such as authentication, permissions, payments, data handling, and failure states.
Yes. The review can lead directly into a rescue sprint, production hardening, or ongoing engineering work if that is the right next step.
No. The report is designed to make the current state of the product understandable to a founder or business owner, while still being specific enough for engineers to act on.
Start with the app URL, repository access when available, the AI tools you used, whether the app has users or payments, and the areas you are worried about. Never send passwords, API keys, or secrets in an email or form.
Your prototype already has value
Send us the app and the part you are worried about. We will start with the engineering reality, then decide whether the right next move is a focused fix, a rescue sprint, production hardening, or continued development.